Environmental Art and Media Reproduction A Look at The Gates of Christo and Jeanne-Claude
The project took on a life of its own, that is, one uncontrolled by the artists themselves, in the popular media. Aesthetic merit was not the chief concern of most critiques. A New York Post editorial was typical in its attack on the installations cost to the city Flapping like undies on a tenement clothesline, the radioactive-looking orange fabric sheets sullied the parks austere winter beauty in the cause of generating a claimed, but entirely unsubstantiated, 254 million in economic activity for the city (Cuozzo). A procession of New York Times headlines shows a more restrained, though no less skeptical, assessment of the installation Whose Color Is It Anyway (February 23, 2005) Some Sadder than Others as first Gates Start Falling (March 1, 2005) Enough About Gates as Art, Lets Talk About that Price Tag (March 5, 2005).
Christo and Jeanne Claude did attempt to put their own spin on the project with an authorized documentary, The Gates, directed by acclaimed filmmaker Albert Maysles. While the film does contain some beautiful shots of the bright gates in a snowy park, most of the screen time is taken up with the reactions of New Yorkers. Some are critical and dismissive, while others demonstrate the proper awe. But this hardly seems like the kind of documentary the artists should have shot if their aim was to impart an authentic aesthetic experience. Filled as it is with perspectives on the art, the documentary lacks the purity of the work itself. It seems that Christo and Jeanne-Claude should have exerted more control over the film representation of the project. And a better handling of the popular media, the media in which, after all, most people would see the installation, would surely have improved the experience many viewers had. The installation and the reaction to it demonstrate how artists working in unconventional media might lose control of their work as it is recorded and reproduced.
0 comments:
Post a Comment